What do you say to a Llama that loves picnicking? Alpaca lunch.


This presentation is available (now) at:

http://www.savethevowels.org/talks


Sound and Meaning

Will Styler - Semantics


The Classical View


Non-arbitrary signs

The sign is causally linked to the signfied

Smoke indicates fire

Bleeding indicates injury

Will’s presence indicates crappy puns


Iconic (or representational) signs

A referential abstraction from the signified

☂ ☃ ☀

Some hand gestures



Arbitrary Signs

Referential only by agreement and widespread knowledge

Non-representational symbols (♄)

Non-iconic gestures


Language!


We’re kind of committed to that idea

“Language - A System of Arbitrary Signs”

(from Finegan’s Language: Its Structure and Use)


(Most) language is based on sound




Phonosemantics

### Phonosemantics
The study of and search for non-arbitary meanings in speech sounds

How can sound have non-arbitrary meaning?

Iconicity

Analogy

Emergent groupings

Sounds really mean something


Meaning by Iconicity


“Sound Effects”


Onomatopoeia


Onomatopoeia

Words which, when spoken, sound kind of like the things they represent


Onomatopoetic Words in English

Gurgle

Woof

Snip

Whoosh

Tweet



What’s your favorite onomatopoetic word?


Onomatopoeia differs across languages



A rooster says…

cock-a-doodle-doo (English)

kukko kiekuu (Finnish)

chicchirichí (Italian)

kuklooku (Urdu)

kukuriku (Hungarian)

Sourced from this awesome site


(So, different languages can’t even map sounds onto sounds uniformly)


Sometimes, the meaning comes from how you say it


Suprasegmental Changes

The changes you can make to a pronunciation without changing the sequence of phonemes used.


Types of Suprasegmental Changes

Pitch of the voice

Duration of sounds/words

Voicing type (Breathy, Creaky)

Articulatory Setting

How could we use each of these to express iconic meaning?


… but meaning doesn’t have to come from iconicity at all!


Meaning by Analogy


Phonological Analogy

Mental links between words which sound similar to each other in some way

“Meaning by association/spreading activation”

Most relevant to neologisms

Sometimes morphologically analyzable


Meaning-by-analogy is everywhere

Analogy at Hogwarts

Slytherin House

Severus Snape

Luna Lovegood

Voldemort


Analogy in PR Crises

Altria (Formerly Philip Morris)

Academi (Formerly Blackwater)

Xfinity (Formerly Comcast)

VALIC (Spun off from AIG)


Analogy in Antidepressants

Elavil

Surmontil

Zoloft

Paxil

Wellbutrin


Analogy in Cosmetics


Analogy in other products

Volkswagen Jetta

Febreze

Rogaine


… but sometimes, whole groups of words sound alike


Meaning by Emergent Groupings (Phonaesthemes)


An Experiment


“Would you like to buy a new Glimp? It…”

  1. Sharpens knives.

  2. Lights up your house.

  3. Tastes good.


“Damnit, I left my meb in the car!”

  1. I won’t be able to sew as well.

  2. I’ll be unable to fill my bird feeders

  3. What if there’s a fire?!


“Have you seen my snofter?…”

  1. My nose is sore.

  2. I dropped a glass.

  3. It’s cold in here.


“I got diabetes. It must be from drinking all that…”

  1. Blurge cola

  2. Murple cola

  3. Slize cola


“You Mom is plafty.”

  1. “Them’s fighting words.”

  2. “Maybe?”

  3. “Thanks!”


“Your Mom is slafty.”

  1. “Them’s fighting words.”

  2. “Maybe?”

  3. “Thanks!”


Phonaesthemes

“Frequently recurring sound-meaning pairings that are not clearly contrastive morphemes”

(definition from Bergen 2004)


Phonaesthemes in English

gl- ‘light, vision’ glimmer, glisten, glitter, gleam, glow, glint, etc.

sn- ‘nose, mouth’ snore, snack, snout, snarl, snort, sniff, sneeze, etc.

sl - ‘pejorative’, slack, slouch, sludge, slime, slash, sloppy, slug, sluggard, slattern, slut, slang, sly, slither, slow, sloth, etc.

b_l - ‘expand abnormally’, blimp, bulge, bulk, balloon, blip


Phonaesthemes aren’t morphemes!

in- ‘inedible’, ‘inconceivable’, ‘indelible’, ‘incorrect’ is a morpheme, not a phonaestheme!


If they’re not morphemes, what are they?


Emergence

Complex systems and patterns which arise through simple interactions


Langton’s Ant

At a white square, turn 90° right, flip the color of the square, move forward one unit

At a black square, turn 90° left, flip the color of the square, move forward one unit



Emergence is useful in language


It could account for phonological phenomena


It could account for constructions in Syntax


It could account for phonaesthemes!


How could phonaesthemes emerge?


How real are phonaesthemes?


Bergen 2004

Bergen 2004 tested this by playing pairs of words which were:

Phonaesthemes (glitter:glow)

Similar sounding (druid:drip)

Similar meaning (cord:rope)

Similar sound/meaning, but not a group (crony:crook)

Baseline (frill:barn)


How real are phonaesthemes?

Reaction times were faster after a phonaestheme than after any other condition!

These results very clearly indicate that targets are responded to much more quickly when they share a phonaestheme with their prime than when they share form, meaning, both, or nothing with it.

So, they sure act real…


Phonaesthemes in language

They can attract new members (drag, flag, lag, and sacke -> “sag”)

According to Keith McCune, most Indonesian language words have phonosemantic components.

Japanese has a rich system of phonosemantics (according to this guy)


… but all of these deal with relations between words.

Do sounds themselves actually have meanings?


The Meaning of Sounds


There are two sides to this coin:

Psuedoscience “sound meanings”

Actual cognitive phenomena


Sound Symbolism Silliness

“Sound Symbolism and your Business Name”





“Sound symbolism” in product naming

“BlackBerry” (Fast segments, nicely timed)

“Dasani” (CVCVCV, simple syllables)

“Swiffer” (Psuedo-phonestheme, onomatopoetic)

People pay Lexicon Branding lots of money to do this.

LOL


There are some real phenomena…


An experiment!


Kiki

Bouba


The Bouba/Kiki Effect

First observed on Tenerife (in Spanish) by Wolfgang Köhler in 1929. There, it was “Takete” vs. “Baluba”.

Repeated with US and Tamil Undergrads by V.S. Ramachandran and Edward Hubbard. 95% labeled them as expected.

2.5 year old kids show a Bouba/Kiki effect too!


Why Kiki and Bouba?

Perhaps it’s mouth-shape related (high vowels vs. lower vowels? Lip rounding?)

Perhaps direct sensory integration.

Autistic Children do not show a Bouba/Kiki effect

But it’s clearly more complicated than the marketers think.


Problems with Phonosemantics



Phonosemantic Problem #1



Phonosemantic Problem #2


If these effects exist, they’re not that strong.


So, do sounds have meaning?


Words and speech can have iconic meaning

Onomatopoeia

Iconic Suprasegmentals


Words can pick up meaning from near neighbors

Similar sounding words can prime meanings

Spreading activation of meaning


Groups of words can sound alike

Phonaesthemes are groups of semantically and phonologically related words.

Phonaesthemes emerge from lexical statistics

Words with phonaesthemes will inherit the meaning of the group.


Sounds can have meaning


… but not nearly as often as the marketers wish!

One concept, many words

It’s most certainly not deterministic

These effects are the exception, not the rule.


So, sounds have meaning, but…


Other phonosemantics resources

Margo’s Magical Letter Page


Thank you!

Will Styler - will@savethevowels.org

http://savethevowels.org/talks/