(This audiovisual content has been removed for compliance with recent federal accessibility guidelines. Please see this site for details.)
---
(This audiovisual content has been removed for compliance with recent federal accessibility guidelines. Please see this site for details.)
---
---
### For the record, Tofurkeys are gross
- Great for comedy, poor for eating
---
(This audiovisual content has been removed for compliance with recent federal accessibility guidelines. Please see this site for details.)
(Thanks to Cae, Fall 2022)
---
Here's another one!
---
### The prescriptivist English Professor glared at the rebellious linguist
---
Spoiler alert.
---
### The prescriptivist English Professor glared at the rebellious linguist
---
---
### OK, OK, enough with the trees!
- Yeah, I know.
---
### This is the problem with LIGN 101
- There's too much awesomeness to Syntax for me to cover in three classes
- We need to focus on what's crucial
- (You all understanding syntactic hierarchy)
- ... over what's awesome
- Cross-linguistic patterns and advanced syntactic questions
---
### ... and a whole lot has been dismissed as "Here there be dragons"
---
# Introducing some Dragons
---
## English Syntax is *way* more complicated
---
### We're looking at relatively simple sentences
- (It may not feel that way, but we are!)
---
### "Truly, my dismay that three dragons were slain by the fame-craving knight couldn't be greater."
- Your phrase structure rules will shatter against such pain.
---
### "Robert who came last weekend when you threw that party where Marvin saw Bob is kind of a jerk."
- That's right, that's two S's inside an NP
---
### Also, sentences will do weird things
- Weird things will be done by sentences.
- Weird things will be the things that sentences do.
- What will sentences do?
- Will sentences do weird things?
---
### Passive Voice
- Miguel threw Rajesh the ball.
- Rajesh was thrown the ball.
- **Passive voice turns the object of a sentence into the subject**
---
### This is a 200 foot pole
- The passive voice will not be touched with it
---
### This makes us think about 'movement' and 'transformation'
- Phrase structure rules don't account for changes
---
### Jessica can buy Cheerios
- Can Jessica buy Cheerios?
- It was Jessica who bought the Cheerios
- Cheerios are what Jessica bought
- Who can buy Cheerios?
- What can Jessica buy?
- Jessica can buy what?
---
(Thanks Jaron from W22!)
---
### The movement... it's everywhere
- Your book gets a bit deeper into this than we have time to
- ... but it's cooooooool.
---
## Here's a fun dragon
---
### Garden Path Sentences
Sentences which are easy to incorrectly parse at first
---
### Example Garden Paths
- The old man the boat.
- The complex houses married soldiers and their families.
- The girl told the story cried.
- The man who whistles tunes pianos.
- The war on plastic faces setback as cost of recycled material soars
- This is from [the Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/13/war-on-plastic-waste-faces-setback-as-cost-of-recycled-material-soars), and was fixed with 'plastic waste' after publication
---
### The horse raced past the barn fell
---
Source:
---
### These occur in human language
---
## Let's look at some other sentences
---
### A is 'Perfectly Grammatical', E is 'Completely Ungrammatical'
---
## More three dogs bit than eight humans.
---
## More cats are on my bed than I can cuddle them.
---
## More sales are expected this year relative to last year.
---
## More tourists have been to England than to Kazakhstan.
---
## More people have been to Russia than I have.
---
## More politicians self-finance their campaigns in the USA than elsewhere.
---
## More undergrads text their friends during the week than I text my friends.
---
### Wait a second...
- More people have been to Russia than I have.
- More undergrads text their friends during the week than I text my friends.
- **What do these actually mean?!?**
---
### These are called 'Comparative Illusions'
- ... and they show that we can have instincts which make something 'seem' grammatical and sensical which actually isn't!
- The factors which make these feel more or less acceptable are a subject of syntactic research
- They can even happen in natural speech
- 'I think there are more candidates on stage who speak Spanish more fluently than our president speaks English.' - [Dan Rather](https://twitter.com/danrather/status/1144076809182408704?lang=en)
---
### How about some center embedding gore?
---
> An apparently new speech disorder a linguistics department our correspondent visited was affected by has appeared.
- An apparently new speech disorder
- a linguistics department
- our correspondent
- visited
- was affected by
- has appeared.
---
> The cause experts the LSA sent investigate remains elusive.
- The cause
- experts
- the LSA
- sent
- investigate
- remains elusive.
---
> Physicians neurologists psychologists other linguists called for help called for help called for help didn’t help either.
- Physicians
- neurologists
- psychologists
- other linguists
- called for help
- called for help
- called for help
- didn’t help either.
---
> The patient the nurse the doctor consulted was sick.
- The patient
- the nurse
- the doctor
- consulted
- was sick.
- wtf?!?!
---
### Thanks to Emily Davis for some of these syntactic troubles
- Also here's the center embedding [source](https://specgram.com/CLI.2/03.bakery.disorder.html)
---
### Modifier Scope issues
- “Crispy Ahi Tuna Tacos”
- Crispy tuna, or Crispy Tacos
---
## There are other approaches to Syntax too!
---
### V', S', IP, and more!
- There are many theories and approaches, each with pros and cons
- This is the case in anything in Linguistics, but especially here!
---
## Other Languages exist!
---
### Different languages do sentences differently
- Not all languages put the Subject (do-er) before the verb, which is followed by the object (which is being affected) ('SVO')
- Lakota is SOV, with postpositions
- ASL is OSV
- Spanish adjectives are after the noun
- Russian can move the arguments around to help make your point
---
---
### Phrase structure rules are language specific, too!
- We'll play with other languages' phrase structure rules in this class!
---
### We're just trying to get you understanding the basics
- What syntax is
- How sentences are composed hierarchically
- ... and one way to analyze the grammar of a small set of sentences
---
### For everything else, LIGN 121
---
### You will abandon these syntax rules once you leave 101
- These rules are meant to get you started, and aren't sufficient for most sentences in English
- You'll develop a better system, which handles more nuance
- Some core aspects of your trees will need to change once you have more than a week for Syntax
- *Clinging to these starting rules once you leave LIGN 101 will frustrate you and your 121 professor!*
---
## Here's an example of something we can't handle
---
### Our rules can act weirdly
Rule 8: VP -> V
Rule 9: VP -> V NP
---
### To arrive
* VP -> V: Will arrived
* VP -> V NP: *Will arrived Jessica
---
### To dream
* VP -> V: Will dreamed
* VP -> V NP: *Will dreamed Jessica
---
### To run
* VP -> V: Will ran
* VP -> V NP: *Will ran Jessica
---
### These are called 'Intransitive verbs'
Verbs that only take a single argument, the 'subject'
---
### To hug
* VP -> V: Will hugged
* VP -> V NP: Will hugged Jessica
---
### To move
* VP -> V: Will moved
* VP -> V NP: Will moved Jessica
---
### To see
* VP -> V: Will saw
* VP -> V NP: Will saw Jessica
---
### These are called 'Transitive verbs'
Verbs that can take two arguments, a subject and an object
---
### To bake
* VP -> V: Will baked
* VP -> V NP: Will baked a cake
* VP -> V NP NP: Will baked Jessica a cake
* VP -> V NP NP: ?Will baked a cake Jessica
---
### To find
* VP -> V: Will found.
* VP -> V NP: Will found a cake
* VP -> V NP NP: Will found Jessica a cake
* VP -> V NP NP: ?Will found a cake Jessica
* VP -> V NP NP: Will found a cake some candles
---
### Ditransitive Constructions
Verbs that take a Subject and two objects
---
### To see
* VP -> V: ?Will saw
* VP -> V NP: Will saw a cake
* VP -> V NP NP: ?Will saw Jessica a cake
* VP -> V NP NP: *Will saw a cake Jessica
---
## Whoa!!
- That was a phrase structure rule with three branches!
- That happens sometimes, although there are usually other ways!
---
### To make
* VP -> V: Will made
* VP -> V NP: Will made a judge
* VP -> V NP NP: Will made Jessica a judge
* VP -> V NP NP: Will made a judge Jessica
---
### To make, continued
* VP -> V NP: Will made a judge (with his modelling clay)
* VP -> V NP NP: Will made Jessica a robot
* VP -> V NP NP: Will made a robot, Jessica
---
### Are you vibing me?
- "I'm vibing."
- "I'm vibing you."
- "I'm vibing with this new album"
- "I'm vibing this new album"
- "I'm vibing her a new album"
---
### Wait a second...
- Our phrase structure rules don't universally apply
- A valid phrase structure rule for one verb might not work for another
- ... and it seems to be *lexically specific*
- It depends on the particular word
- ## Is there no hope?!
---
(This audiovisual content has been removed for compliance with recent federal accessibility guidelines. Please see this site for details.)
---
### (Nah, it's cool, we've got semantics)
- See you next time!
---
Thank you!